Carolyn Layden-Stevenson (shown in the photo on the left) was a graduate of University of New Brunswick Law School, a former lawyer and long time resident of Fredericton, New Brunswick, and subsequently a justice of the Federal Court and Federal Court of Appeal died on June 27, 2012.
There is good reason to believe she was murdered.
There is good reason to believe Carolyn Layden-Stevenson was murdered as a result of a criminal conspiracy to obstruct justice and cover up serious crimes by Canada's political legal and judicial elites and, according to reliable sources the Royal Family.
We don't believe that Queen Elizabeth, Prime Minister Harper, Premier Alward, the Chief Justice of Canada of any other person occupying a politically appointed office, such as Queen Elizabeth occupies, is or should be above the law.
Click here to read more about the murder of Justice Carolyn Layden-Stevenson from Fredericton New Brunswick:
Editors Note: This post reflects the opinions of the Editors and is not endorsed or conformed by Evelyn Greene who has no knowledge of the cause of death of Justice Layden-Stevenson Readers with information leading to identification and conviction of those responsible are asked waterwarcrimes@gmail.com
We wish to thank our readers for their patience. The Evelyn Greene Story of corruption and Crime in Fredericton New Brunswick has returned.
Showing posts with label Fredericton City Police. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fredericton City Police. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 16, 2013
Wednesday, May 1, 2013
Fredericton Newspaper Mocks Provincial Court, Ambulance New Brunswick, the New Brunswick Prosecution Service and the Fredericton City Police
The Irving Brothers controlled Fredericton newspaper, The Daily Gleanor, has finally alerted its readers to the scandalous and very dangerous conduct of the Provincial Court of New Brunswick, Ambulance New Brunswick, the New Brunswick Prosecution Service and the Fredericton City Police with a mocking cartoon, published April 26, 2013, shown on left. The cartoon correctly makes a mockery of the New Brunswick Provincial Court under the leadership of Chief Judge Leslie Jackson.
One of the pruposes of a judiciary, in a free and democratic country, is to protect average citizens from abuse by government officials.
The record speaks clearly that Fredericton resident Evelyn Greene was abused by government officials who, not only attempted to cover up drug usage and, probably, drug trafficking by staff at Ambulance New Brunswick by calling the Fredericton City Police to remove a sick patient, who was not causing any trouble, but those government officials were also part of a conspiracy to obstruct the course of justice by fabricating evidence that would prevent Evelyn Greene from proving she was illegally assaulted by a police officer and did not commit the crimes she was alleged to have committed.
The verdict of Chief Judge Leslise Jackson sets a very very danmgerous precedent because it sends the wrong message to drug using or drug trafficking staff at Ambulance New Brunswick. The verdict sends the wrong message to Fredericton City Police officers who abuse citizens. The verdict sends the wrong message to New Brunwick Prosecution Service who attempt to obstruct the course of justice. The verdict of Chief Judge Leslie Jackson sends the essage that the New Brunswick provincial court judiciary are on the side of abusive police officers, they are on the side of criminal activity by government staff and they are on the side of Crown prosecutors who suppress, conceal or fabricate evidence against citizens in order to protect criminals in the government.
Perhaps it is time that New Brunswick Provincial Court judges were elected instead of being appointed by corrupt government officers.
Monday, April 22, 2013
University of New Brunswick Retracts Eviction of Whistle Blower
![]() |
| University of New Brunswickl logo |
![]() |
| BRUCE ROGERSON |
Mr. Rogerson's conduct is consistent with the best practices recommended for organizations that make mistakes.
"When ya make a mistake, admit it, apologize, make amends and fix the system so it doesn't happen again".
Unfortunately, Mr. Rogerson's exemplary conduct has been contrary to the experience of Evelyn Greene with other institutions in New Brunswick, such as the Fredericton City Police, Ambulance New Brunswick, the City of Fredericton, the Everett Chalmers Regional Hospital, some of the registry staff, sheriffs and judges at the Fredericton Court house, the lawyers with several large law firms in Fredericton, staff at several other governmental institutions and the Irving Brothers controlled media.
Ms. Greene was also favourably impressed with the conduct of the security at the Law Library, led by Mr. Steven Stafford, who treated her with dignity and respect when they were asked to execute the orders that arose from the mis-understanding.
The conduct of Mr. Rogerson, Mr. Stafford and others connected with Security at the University of New Brunswick prove that are at some decent people left in New Brunswick and should be a lesson for those with the Fredericton City Police and elsewhere who have treated Evelyn Greene so shabbily over the past few years.
Sunday, April 14, 2013
A Tale of Two Judges: Jackson, in New Brunswick, and O'Donnell, in Ontario
![]() |
| Ontario Judge Fergus O'Donnell |
Often, the problem is corruption on the part of judges and lawyers.
When judges and lawyers bend, twist and pervert the law to protect cronies, working colleagues and family friends they speak or write the law crookedly - on purpose -, innocent people are convicted to protect others and the public are confused.
This past week in Ontario, an honest judge, Fergus O'Donnell, dismissed a charge of assault brought by the police against an innocent citizen. The police had arrested Matthew Duncan without any lawful right to do so and, as they attempted to take Mr. Duncan into custody he resisted.
Judge O'Donnell, a former prosecutor with Canada's National Prosecution Service, dismissed the charge, corrected the police and reasserted the law that, in Canada, every citizen has the right to resist an unlawful arrest.
It is self-evident that a charge of assault to resist arrest requires proof of a lawful arrest. This is not a Charter issue; it is a fundamental element of the offence. The requirement reflects the important fact that in a democracy agents of the state operate within limits. If an arrest is unlawful, resistance to that arrest is not unlawful
Click here to read the case of R. v. Duncan 2013 ONCJ 160 Canlii
By contrast, in Fredericton, New Brunswick, when Provincial Court Chief Judge, Leslie Jackson, (shown in centre of photo on right) was faced with a similar situation in the case of Evelyn Greene, a 62 year old woman who midly resisted the illegal attempt of four police officers to remove her from a Public Health Facility where she was seeking medical treatment, Judge Jackson found in favour of the police and convicted Evelyn Greene, leaving court watchers shaking their heads and wondering if Judge Jackson is "on the take", if he is afraid of the police or if he found in favour of the police because one of the officers, Constable Nancy Rideout, who has a history of assaulting private citizens, is the daughter of another New Brunswick judge.
At the time of this post, Judge Jackson has not published written reasons for his bizarre decision and the Editors are waiting for him to explain his controversial decision.
Evelyn Greene has filed an appeal of the decision while others are asking if Chief Judge Jackson will be investigated for corruption which is highly unlikely given that Crown prosecutors were accused of conspiring with the police to fabricate evidence as part of a sinister plot to railroad Evelyn Greene in order to protect drug dealing staff at the a local medical facility.
Thursday, January 24, 2013
Out of Control Fredericton City Police
When Evelyn Greene could not get the responsible government agencies in New Brunswick to carry out a proper investigation of the heinous attack made against her at the Dr. Everett Chalmers Regional Hospital, she drew up some papers to get access to information under the Freedom Of Information legislation and, on May 13, 2011, she personally delivered those papers to the various agencies one of which was the Ambulance New Brunswick facility on Harold Doherty Road in Fredericton.
Based on investigations, it now appears that the the staff at Ambulance New Brunswick were alerted in advance to Greene's visit and they set a devious trap for her that included the Frederitcon City Police as willing participants.
Here are the facts and the we will let the reader be the judge.
The Ambulance New Brunswick on Doherty Road is a public health facility which means Greene had right to be there, to request and receive medical services, and not to be ejected by the staff or the police for no good reason.
Greene entered the Ambulance New Brunswick facility and asked to speak to the manager so she could give him the papers requesting documents under the Freedom of Information Act. The staff told her the manager was away and would be returning later so Greene advised she would wait for him in the sitting area and she also asked for someone to take her blood pressure and other vitals because she was not feeling well.
Greene went over to the sitting area and sat down. Suddenly, within minutes, four police cars showed up and four officers got out and entered the Ambulance New Brunswick building looking for Greene. The lead officer, Nancy Rideout, came over to Greene and told her to leave the building. Greene told Rideout that she wasn't feeling well, needed to sit for a while and was waiting for medical attention.
Instead of leaving Greene alone, officer Nancy Rideout was clearly on a mission and, without lawful authority, assaulted Greene by grabbing her arm to try to remove her from the building and Greene responded, as she was legally entitled to do, by brushing Rideout's hand away and telling her to leave her alone because she was sick.
Greene was legally entitled to do this because a police officer, in Canada, does not have legal authority to grab someone and attempt to remove them from a public health faciltiy, especially when they are there for treatment, as Greene was. The proper procedure is for the police officer to first put the person under arrest for some crime and then, and only then, does the officer have the legal authority to use force to remove a person from a public building. However, since Greene was committing no crime, officer Rideout had no authority to arrest her or touch her in any way.
The incident should have ended there but officer Rideout, who, incidentally, has a history of accusations made against her by the public for police brutality, seized the opportunity to declare that Greene was now under arrest for assaulting a police in the course of her duties, a declaration which was not entirely correct because officer Rideout had no legal right to ask Greene to leave a public health facility where she was seeking treatment and then to use force to try to remove her and, under common law, Greene had a lawful right to use reasonable force to protect herself from the unlawful assault of Rideout who was, at the time, a police officer who had stepped over the line between acting in the course of her duties and acting outside the course of her duties.
Not only did Rideout arrest Greene without cause, but, according to Greene, Officer Rideout then led her outside the building through the double entry doors where Rideout, thinking the security cameras, would not see her, inflicted a brutal assault on Greene that left Greene with visible bruises. While in police custody Greene was, for a time, denied access to her medication and when released she found that a significant sum of moeny had gone missing from her purse.
Greene was charged with assaulting a police officer and the local Crown Counsel, who work closely with the police and the drug using staff at the local hospital, pursued the prosecution with an unsual vigour and disregard for due process that creates the strong smell of corruption at the Crown Counsel offices of the Province of New Brunswick.
The editors acknowledge that police are in a tough position and make decisions that they later regret but when a police officer, like Nancy Rideout, loses control in the course of her duties and assaults an innocent citizen waiting for medical treatment, it is time to send that officer for a psychiatric assessment and re-training instead of covering up his or her criminal conduct.
Unfortunately, instead of reprimanding Rideout and having her assesed by a competent psychiatrist, the City of Fredericton, Crown Counsel, and the Attorney General for New Brunswick decided that a cover up was their best alternative but, in the course of that cover up, they made a very serious mistake because when Greene asked for copies of the video surveillance tapes at the Ambulance New Brunswick faciltiy where she was arrested and assaulted by Rideout they gave Greene a copy that had clearly been tampered with (according to three expert witnesses) and that proved that the Crown Counsel office in Fredericton was not only protecting an out of control police officer but that they were also protecting drug using staff at a public health facility thereby endangering every resident of the province.
Click here to read accusations of assault by Police Officer Nancy Rideout on Fredericton Resident Andre Murray - scroll down to pages 25 and 26.
Click here to read accusation of assault by Police Officer Nancy Rideout on Amherst resident T.C. - scroll down to paragraphs 40 to 43.
The Editors caution the reader that while the foreging accusations by T.C. and Andre Murray have not been proved in a court of that does not mean they did not occur. However, when three unrleated citizens, all of good repute, make similar accusations against the same police officer then the rational person concludes that it is probable that the police officer is guilty as charged.
Moreover, in the Greene case, there was video evidence and that evidence has been tampered with and that tampering proves the police had something they wished to cover up.
What is disgraceful if that the Public Prosecution Service of New Brunswick, also known as Crown Counsel, knows the video evidence was tampered with and Crown Counsel is continuing its prosecution against Greene on the basis of video evidence they know has been tampered with. Of course, they also intend to reply on the evidence of the police officer who, on the basis of sworn statements by three unrelated citizens, appears to be a danger to the public.
What is even more disgraceful is that some of the judges of the local New Brunswick Provincial Court have assisted local Crown Counsel and the City of Fredericton Police to resisted Greene's applications to get a full copy of the original video surveillance tapes thereby calling into question the independence and intergfity of New Brunswick Provincial Court judiciary.
Based on investigations, it now appears that the the staff at Ambulance New Brunswick were alerted in advance to Greene's visit and they set a devious trap for her that included the Frederitcon City Police as willing participants.
Here are the facts and the we will let the reader be the judge.
The Ambulance New Brunswick on Doherty Road is a public health facility which means Greene had right to be there, to request and receive medical services, and not to be ejected by the staff or the police for no good reason.
Greene entered the Ambulance New Brunswick facility and asked to speak to the manager so she could give him the papers requesting documents under the Freedom of Information Act. The staff told her the manager was away and would be returning later so Greene advised she would wait for him in the sitting area and she also asked for someone to take her blood pressure and other vitals because she was not feeling well.
![]() |
| Is Nancy Rideout and out of control police officer? |
Instead of leaving Greene alone, officer Nancy Rideout was clearly on a mission and, without lawful authority, assaulted Greene by grabbing her arm to try to remove her from the building and Greene responded, as she was legally entitled to do, by brushing Rideout's hand away and telling her to leave her alone because she was sick.
Greene was legally entitled to do this because a police officer, in Canada, does not have legal authority to grab someone and attempt to remove them from a public health faciltiy, especially when they are there for treatment, as Greene was. The proper procedure is for the police officer to first put the person under arrest for some crime and then, and only then, does the officer have the legal authority to use force to remove a person from a public building. However, since Greene was committing no crime, officer Rideout had no authority to arrest her or touch her in any way.
![]() |
| Police Brutality Has Come To New Brunswick |
Not only did Rideout arrest Greene without cause, but, according to Greene, Officer Rideout then led her outside the building through the double entry doors where Rideout, thinking the security cameras, would not see her, inflicted a brutal assault on Greene that left Greene with visible bruises. While in police custody Greene was, for a time, denied access to her medication and when released she found that a significant sum of moeny had gone missing from her purse.
Greene was charged with assaulting a police officer and the local Crown Counsel, who work closely with the police and the drug using staff at the local hospital, pursued the prosecution with an unsual vigour and disregard for due process that creates the strong smell of corruption at the Crown Counsel offices of the Province of New Brunswick.
The editors acknowledge that police are in a tough position and make decisions that they later regret but when a police officer, like Nancy Rideout, loses control in the course of her duties and assaults an innocent citizen waiting for medical treatment, it is time to send that officer for a psychiatric assessment and re-training instead of covering up his or her criminal conduct.
Unfortunately, instead of reprimanding Rideout and having her assesed by a competent psychiatrist, the City of Fredericton, Crown Counsel, and the Attorney General for New Brunswick decided that a cover up was their best alternative but, in the course of that cover up, they made a very serious mistake because when Greene asked for copies of the video surveillance tapes at the Ambulance New Brunswick faciltiy where she was arrested and assaulted by Rideout they gave Greene a copy that had clearly been tampered with (according to three expert witnesses) and that proved that the Crown Counsel office in Fredericton was not only protecting an out of control police officer but that they were also protecting drug using staff at a public health facility thereby endangering every resident of the province.
Click here to read accusations of assault by Police Officer Nancy Rideout on Fredericton Resident Andre Murray - scroll down to pages 25 and 26.
Click here to read accusation of assault by Police Officer Nancy Rideout on Amherst resident T.C. - scroll down to paragraphs 40 to 43.
The Editors caution the reader that while the foreging accusations by T.C. and Andre Murray have not been proved in a court of that does not mean they did not occur. However, when three unrleated citizens, all of good repute, make similar accusations against the same police officer then the rational person concludes that it is probable that the police officer is guilty as charged.
Moreover, in the Greene case, there was video evidence and that evidence has been tampered with and that tampering proves the police had something they wished to cover up.
What is disgraceful if that the Public Prosecution Service of New Brunswick, also known as Crown Counsel, knows the video evidence was tampered with and Crown Counsel is continuing its prosecution against Greene on the basis of video evidence they know has been tampered with. Of course, they also intend to reply on the evidence of the police officer who, on the basis of sworn statements by three unrelated citizens, appears to be a danger to the public.
What is even more disgraceful is that some of the judges of the local New Brunswick Provincial Court have assisted local Crown Counsel and the City of Fredericton Police to resisted Greene's applications to get a full copy of the original video surveillance tapes thereby calling into question the independence and intergfity of New Brunswick Provincial Court judiciary.
Tuesday, January 22, 2013
The Nazis Come to New Brunswick
![]() |
| New Brunswick, Canada |
Greene complained to the Administration at Dr. Everett Chalmers Regional Hospital, the College of Physicians and Surgeons for New Brunswick, the Nurses Association of New Brunswick, the Paramedic Association of New Brunswick, and the Fredericton City Police.
All of these institutiuons that are established to protect the public interest refused to take effective official action but, as she contimued to look into the matter and press for an official investigation, officialdom in New Brunswick retaliated against her in a viscious, unprofessional and brutal manner similar to the conduct of the much feared Gestapo under Adolf Hitler in early years of Nazi, Germany.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







